Talk:Mega Man RPG Prototype

I think we should evaluate why this article should be moved before moving it. It's no different than the likes of games like Rockman 7 FC in that it's fanmade and merely a revamp of Capcom content. If both Rockman 7 FC and Rockman 8 FC get their own pages, why should this article be an exception to the rule?

King Yamato (talk) 02:27, January 3, 2014 (UTC)King Yamato

The game is not official and in no way claims to be, but I feel like it is just as substantial and worthy of being on the Wiki as the likes of Mega Man Revolution , Mega Man Unlimited, or Mega Man Project Zero for example. It is obviously much different than those games and lacks the run-jump-shoot action of the original series, but what it lacks in graphics and framerate it makes up for in depth and replayability. I realize my opinion is biased, but the game has been in a playable-alpha state for nearly three years and since then a great number of people have contributed to the project. If the article must be moved than so be it - I do not want to cause any trouble - but if the article was allowed to stay and benefit from the expose I would be eterally grateful and I'm sure the other contributors would be too. Thank you.

AdrianM (talk) 03:08, January 3, 2014 (UTC)

I think MMRPG Prototype should stay. There are many fan games on this wiki such as Mega Man Unlimited, Rock Man 7 FC, Mega Man Triple Threat (which is in about the same stage as this game), etc. I have played the game for only a month, and I have invested around 9 to 10 hours of gameplay every single day that I can! The maker of this game has worked many years on this game, and I (and more than 700 other people) would be very upset if it had to be moved to the Mega Man Fanon Wiki. So what if it's DIFFERENT than other fan games, there is a HUGE amount of depth, the graphics look amazing, the gameplay is great, I have a hard time finding any problems with this game! Whenever I get into the topic of Mega Man with some one, this is usually the first thing that comes to mind. Before you give your judgement on whether this should stay or not, please play the game first to decide whether this deserves to be more popular or not. For me, deleting this article would be like Dr. Wily deleting the world.

Retro Pikachu (talk) 03:26, January 3, 2014 (UTC) Retro Pikachu (known as accpikachu2 on the game's community).

MegaBossMan (talk) 03:47, January 3, 2014 (UTC) A lot of people want this game to stay on the page and most of the members haven't even seen it yet! I advise to please let it stay! Why fight when you could just leave it on!

Keep it on!
I want the page to stay on the website for the same reasons as KingYamato. I was the one who created the page and I put a lot of work in it. Please consider to keep the page to stay! I am not trying to start a flame war but consider to keep it on! A lot of people have commented on it already and it's nightfall so most people aren't on! I would suggest to keep it on or else we might have a flood of comments

MegaBossMan (talk) 03:26, January 3, 2014 (UTC)

I appreciate the enthusiasm from everyone and I really hope the article can stay, but if the mods decide against it please do not lash out or otherwise retaliate at the MMKB. The Fanon Wiki may not get as many viewers but that's okay. I feel like this is what Nintendo would call a "blue ocean" type game and even if it takes a while to catch on it doesn't prevent us from having fun with it and continuing to develop it. I'm just asking that whatever happens, we keep this civil and bow out gracefully if the time comes. Thank you again. :)

AdrianM (talk) 03:54, January 3, 2014 (UTC)

You're right but we still need to protest until they decide to keep it on or not. Despite all our spirit, if we lose, we lose but for now we gotta try and keep it on! Remeber I am not trying to offend anyone on the site but there might be some others who might get too crazy. That doesn't mean to give up though!

MegaBossMan (talk) 03:58, January 3, 2014 (UTC)